Nursing Homes in Vancouver, Washington — 2026 CMS Evidence Comparison

What the CMS record shows locally

Vancouver has 6 CMS-certified skilled nursing facilities. Linked deficiency history is available for 6 of 6 listed facilities, averaging 34.2 citations per facility versus 49.5 statewide. Among that denominator, 0 have zero citations in the loaded history and 2 have Immediate Jeopardy-level citations in that history; the newest linked survey date shown here is December 2025. Facilities without linked history are not treated as zero-citation facilities.

City-Specific Citation Patterns

The most frequent recorded tags are:

• F0684 — Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. (13 citations)
• F0656 — Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured. (11 citations)
• F0578 — Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive. (9 citations)
• F0686 — Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing. (8 citations)
• F0625 — Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave. (7 citations)

Facility Directory

1. The Oaks At Timberline — 23 deficiencies across 4 surveys
2. Hudson Bay Health And Rehabilitation — 24 deficiencies across 5 surveys (Immediate Jeopardy history in loaded records)
3. Vancouver Specialty And Rehab Care — 30 deficiencies across 8 surveys
4. Avamere Rehabilitation Of Cascade Park — 32 deficiencies across 7 surveys
5. Salmon Creek Post Acute & Rehabilitation — 42 deficiencies across 11 surveys
6. Bridge Crest Post Acute — 54 deficiencies across 13 surveys (Immediate Jeopardy history in loaded records)

Source, freshness, and limitations

Official facts come from CMS nursing-home Provider Data published from state survey inspections; the newest linked survey date shown here is December 2025. POCDesk organizes those records into comparisons and summaries; it does not replace CMS Care Compare or an in-person assessment. Survey timing differs by facility, missing linked history remains unknown, and citation counts alone do not measure staffing, outcomes, or current conditions. See our editorial standards and methodology.

View all nursing homes in Washington

Explore POCDesk — Free Nursing Home Compliance Tools

• SNF Scorecard — look up any facility's inspection record
• Nursing Home Compare Tool — side-by-side comparisons
• Skilled Nursing Near Me — find facilities by city & state
• Best Nursing Homes by State — ranked by inspection results
• Survey Tracker — recent CMS survey activity
• F-Tag Reference Guide — every CMS deficiency tag
• Plan of Correction (POC) Complete Guide
• Free AI POC Generator
• Plan of Correction Examples
• CMS Survey Preparation Guide
• SNF Compliance Guides
• What Is Skilled Nursing Care?

Official Sources

POCDesk analyzes official government data. Verify any facility's record or read the underlying regulations at these primary sources:

• Medicare.gov Care Compare — CMS's official nursing home comparison tool
• CMS Provider Data Catalog — the raw nursing home inspection & deficiency datasets
• CMS Nursing Home Certification & Compliance — enforcement policy and the Special Focus Facility program
• 42 CFR Part 483 (eCFR) — the federal requirements of participation behind every F-Tag
• National Long-Term Care Ombudsman Resource Center — free advocacy help for residents and families